ACCIDENTS IN THE MINING INDUSTRY IN RUSSIA THAT OCCURRED AS A RESULT OF DYNAMIC MANIFESTATIONS IN THE MOUNTAIN RANGE. CONTROL OF MOUNTAIN PRESSURE AT THE YUZHNOYE FIELD (PRIMORSKY KRAI)

Authors

  • Mikhail A. Lomov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25635/2313-1586.2023.01.085

Keywords:

geomechanics, rock pressure, state of stress, rock bursts, prediction, methods, control, mortality statistics

Abstract

In Russia, as well as in many countries, there is a tendency of conditions complication for the minerals development. Almost all mining enterprises are classified as hazardous production facilities. Russia occupies one of the leading places in the world in the mining industry, but, unfortunately, accidents occur on its territory, resulting in injuries and death of workers. Accidents at a mining enterprise can occur for various reasons, including changes in the geomechanical and geodynamic state of the rock mass under developing, where dynamic manifestations of rock pressure can be initiated by mining operations or rock impacts, as a result of which people may suffer.
The first part of this work provides an analysis and comparison of sources on accidents in the mining in-dustry in Russia for 2017-2022, showing that accidents at a mining enterprise can occur for various reasons. This problem is present in our country, people are dying and being injured and this trend continues. Statistics on accidents that occurred as a result of dynamic manifestations in the mountain range are considered in more detail.
The second part of the work describes the development and installation of measuring instruments for the creation of a geodynamic polygon for complex geomechanical monitoring of impact hazard and technogenic seismicity in the Dalnegorsky ore region. In particular, it shows the design with use of the "AntennaCalc" program and a volumetric digital model of the geophone network field and the installation of an automated mountain pressure system "Prognoz-ADS" at the Southern field, which is dangerous for mountain im-pacts.

References

Liang W.Z., Dai B., Zhao G.Y., Wu H., 2020. A scientometric review on rockburst in hard rock: two decades of review from 2000 to 2019. Geofluids, Vol. 17.

Farhadian Hadi, 2021. A new empirical chart for rockburst analysis in tunnelling: Tunnel rockburst classification (TRC). International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, Vol. 31(4), Р. 603 – 610.

Feng J., Wang E., Ding H., Huang Q., Chen X., 2020. Deterministic seismic hazard assessment of coal fractures in underground coal mine: A case study. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., Vol. 129, Р. 105921.

Li C., Ma M., Zhu L., Meng G. and Chen, 2017. Geomechanical types and mechan-ical analyses of rockbursts. Engineering Geology, Vol. 222, Р. 72 – 83.

Sun F., Fan J., Guo J., Shi X., Liu X., Zhu B., Zhang H., 2021. Rockburst proneness criterion based on energy principle. Gaoya Wuli Xuebao. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, Vol. 35(3).

Published

2023-03-30

Issue

Section

GEOMECHANICAL AND GEODYNAMIC PROCESSES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF DEPOSITS